Kan de verspreiding van de eurocrisis worden gestopt?

Foto: Sargasso achtergrond wereldbol

Een bijdrage van Philip Whyte, senior research fellow at the Centre for European Reform.

Ever since the EU and the IMF ‘bailed out’ Greece in May last year, the eurozone has fought a desperate rear-guard battle to stem contagion to other countries – with little success. Ireland and Portugal have since been bailed out, and Cyprus could be next. The most disquieting development, however, has been incipient contagion to larger economies like Spain and Italy. Unless this contagion is arrested, the eurozone could face a potentially terminal crisis. For the past year, the Spanish government has been battling valiantly to persuade financial markets that it will not be the next domino in the chain. But the change in sentiment towards Italy has been more recent – and is perhaps more alarming. What explains it?

Until early July, Italy had just about convinced the financial markets that it was not the ‘next Greece’. A cynic might justifiably wonder why. The country’s structural problems, after all, are as profound as they are well-known. It has a rapidly ageing population. Its ratio of public debt to GDP is the second highest in the eurozone (after Greece). Productivity has barely risen over the past decade. Rising wages have consequently pushed up unit labour costs, eroding the country’s trade competitiveness. Governance, moreover, is notoriously weak: because of the dysfunctional nature of the political system, few eurozone countries have done less in recent years to improve the supply-side performance of their economy.

Given these longstanding weaknesses, why did sentiment towards Italy not sour earlier? Until recently, Italy was thought to have several advantages over other countries in the eurozone’s troubled geographical periphery. Unlike Ireland and Spain, it did not experience a domestic credit boom in the run-up to the global financial crisis. Private sector balance sheets are therefore stronger: households are not over-indebted, and Italian banks fared well in recent stress tests. Italy, moreover, has been running smaller budget deficits than Greece or Portugal; in 2011, it is expected to run a primary budget surplus. Unlike in Greece and Portugal, budget deficits did not seem to pose a threat to Italy’s public debt sustainability.

Since July, however, market sentiment has changed alarmingly. At the time of writing, the yield on 10-year Italian government bonds stands at 6.12% – up from 4.73% at the end of June (and from 3.73% in October 2010). The spread over German bunds, which had fallen to almost zero in 2008, has now widened to 370 basis points. As in Greece, heightened perceptions of sovereign risk are hitting sentiment towards Italian banks (which have large exposures to their home country’s sovereign debt). Even banks that fared well in the EU’s recent stress tests have not been spared: the share prices of all Italian banks have taken a pummelling. Why has sentiment towards Italy soured so dramatically over the past month?

It is tempting to pin all the blame on political infighting and paralysis. It certainly does not help that the government is hamstrung by a small majority in parliament, or that relations between the prime minister and the finance minister are poor. Nor does it help that Silvio Berlusconi seems more inclined to use the office of prime minister to advance his private interests than the public one. But it is not as if these factors became apparent only in early July. Besides, Spain, whose government has shown greater focus and determination than Italy’s over the past year, has also experienced rising borrowing costs. So a strong political commitment to reform is necessary to restore confidence in Italy. But it may not be sufficient.

To see why, consider Japan – a country that displays many of the same ills as Italy. Like Italy, Japan has a rapidly ageing population. It also suffers from political paralysis and low economic growth. Japan’s public finances, moreover, are in much worse shape than Italy’s: its ratio of public debt to GDP is almost twice as large as Italy’s, and it is set to run a bigger budget deficit in 2011. If the recent spike in Italian government bond yields was solely driven by market fears about political stasis, low growth, weak public finances and a dearth of economic reforms, one might have expected Japanese bond yields to have risen in tandem with Italy’s. Yet they have fallen: 10-year Japanese bonds now yield just 1.2%.

Why have two countries with similar problems experienced such contrasting fortunes? Beleaguered European politicians may be tempted to blame market irrationality. A more plausible explanation is that less creditworthy sovereign issuers are more fragile inside a monetary union than outside, as they issue debt in a currency over which they have little control. The emerging framework for dealing with stressed sovereigns in the eurozone has heightened perceptions of fragility. A sovereign can only remain solvent if markets are confident that a ‘credit event’ is not in prospect. That confidence has weakened in the eurozone because ‘bail outs’ are increasingly seen as a prelude to, rather than a means of avoiding, a default.

The result is that bond yields inside the eurozone have become increasingly polarised between the weak and the strong. Italy could certainly do much to restore market confidence in the long-term sustainability of its public debt by enacting reforms that raise the economy’s long-term rate of growth. But it is illusory to believe that the country’s borrowing costs can be restored to more sustainable levels by action in Italy alone. The fate of Italy – and, by extension, the eurozone – is likely to be determined as much as by decisions in Berlin and Brussels as by those in Rome. It is becoming harder to see how the polarisation of yields within the eurozone can be reversed unless European leaders adopt a common Eurobond.

Reacties (6)

#1 AB

Helder artikel.

Vraag me wel af, in hoeverre speculatie desondanks een rol speelt. Zeker als je bv Spanje en Italie vergelijkt. Merkwaardig dat Italie tot voor gisteren er relatief beter voor stond op de leenmarkt dan Spanje… De problemen van Italie lijken structureler, omvangrijker en met minder perspectief op een goede afloop.

  • Volgende discussie
#2 Share

Kan wel maar zal niet gebeuren, omdat we met politiek zitten, en politici volgen het geld en niet de mensen.

  • Volgende discussie
  • Vorige discussie
#3 Chinaman

Seems you failed to mention that Japan has currency assets about half the size as the public debt. They will be able to pay anything anybody throws at them…

  • Volgende discussie
  • Vorige discussie
#4 Bismarck

@1: Japan met zijn torenhoge schulden en dito begrotingstekorten wordt er wat mij betreft ook terecht bijgehaald. Zeker als je bedenkt dat het BNP al jaren nauwelijks groeit, terwijl ondanks de vergevorderde vergrijzing de werkloosheid er toeneemt.

  • Volgende discussie
  • Vorige discussie
#5 Bismarck

@3: Alleen zijn die reserves vooral bedoeld om de eigen munt waarde te geven. Daarnaast heeft Japan dan weer heel weinig goud (en dus die buitenlandse valuta, vooral dollars, daar hard voor nodig). Tenslotte kan de waarde van dat potje heel snel dalen, zodra ze in de VS de geldpers aanzetten.

  • Volgende discussie
  • Vorige discussie
#6 JSK

@3: They will be able to pay about half the size of their outstanding debt.

Ik denk dat het grote verschil vooral is dat het voor de Japanse overheid makkelijker is om aan meer geld te komen (van individuele spaarders, grote bedrijven of de rijken). Een dergelijke solidariteit tussen Italianen, laat staan tussen Europeanen, is veel minder plausibel.

Ik denk zelf dat de recente onrust op de markten een test is: zolang het onduidelijk is of de rijken in de Eurozone de armen zullen helpen, blijven obligatieprijzen volatiel.

@5: Niet helemaal. Of: helemaal niet.

  • Vorige discussie