Een sociologie van verkrachting
I know I am behind on this but if you read French, you should read Laurent Mucchielli’s post on the sociological aspects of rape (and the book the post is based on).
As Mucchielli notes, when rape is discussed in the media or the larger society, it is often in the context of sensational cases either involving celebrities (DSK, athletes, etc.) or “spectacular” cases where rapists become household names (think Dutroux or Fourniret). At the other hand of the spectrum, there seems to be a publishing niche for testimonial books whose reading is unbearable. In combination, these trends construct rape as one of the most abhorrent crimes deserving of maximal social sanction.
But for Mucchielli, the everyday reality of rape is different (which is not to negate the above) when one uses the sociological method to explore what rape, in contemporary society really involves beyond media coverage and publishing trends. The book linked to above is the result of this work. What does this show?
First, rape is a crime of proximity despite the medieval persistence of the “stranger danger” stereotype, or the image of the woman walking alone at night, chased by her aggressor, then raped and sometimes killed. That stereotype is common in various fictional media and widely used by politicians, often with pro-patriarchal motives (women are safer home, shouldn’t be out late at night, working or going out, etc.). The book’s studies show that in 85% of rape, offender and victim know each other.
Gilbert Welch hield vandaag een pleidooi voor het bestrijden van overdiagnostiek en de ellende die daar voor patiënten uit voortkomt. Hij deed dat op 
