The Outsourced Self

I have long been a fan of Arlie Hochschild’s work ever since I read The Second Shift. I think she has been one of the most readable professional sociologists, combining great insights on gender, labor and family dynamics. Her book co-authored and co-edited with Barbara Ehrenreich, Global Woman, is a brilliant piece of work delineating the way globalization finds its way into family structures in the larger context of workplace changes. So, needless to say, I was eager to grab a copy of The Outsourced Self – Intimate Life in Market Times.

I have to say that I ended up a bit disappointed. As always, the book is very well written and very accessible to an audience broader than academics but there is only one idea in this book and it is contained in the title: the fact that individuals and families can now outsource to the market and the private sector a series of functions that used to be fulfilled by relatives, neighbors or community members.

[I read the book in Kindle edition hence the locations]

“The trend has accelerated particularly in the last forty years, a period when the market came to dominate American life as never before. Voices calling for larger market control— for deregulation, privatization, cuts to government services— grew louder. 15 Accordingly, many aspects of post-1970s American life slipped from the realms of community, commons, and government into the market. Prisons, parks, libraries, sectors of the armed forces, security services, schools, universities— these have moved, in full or part, into for-profit hands. The market, it is said, can do things better— even in the home.

Today, the market offers families an extraordinary array of possibilities. Americans now live within a cycle of market take-away and give-back. While market forces have eroded stability and fostered anxiety at work and at home, it is, ironically, mainly the market that now provides support and relief. Along with the more familiar resources of child care and home help, Americans can now readily employ personal trainers, event planners, life coaches, and dog walkers, to name a few. Once reserved for the elite, personal services have been increasingly extended to the middle class, with more Americans living or being hired to provide them than ever before.” (Loc. 200)

The point is not that using services is new. It is not, of course. It is that the use of services digs deeper and deeper into all facets of our intimate life, as Hochschild demonstrates as each chapter deals with one type of service, from love coaches, to pregnancy surrogates, to household managers, to on-call family therapists, to children birthday party planners, to elder care, etc. There is now an incredible array of services available to families, at least for those who can afford it.

To outsource family functions to market actors allows more partners, spouses and parents to put in more and longer hours at work (which increases their earnings and their ability to afford these services). And at the same time as more people purchase these services, there remain shades of discomfort – sometimes ambivalence and guilt – about doing so so that Hochschild’s subjects always take care to point out their boundaries: the parts of their intimate life that they would refuse to privatize and outsource to the market. Ultimately, for Hochschild, the solution to very real needs (due to changes in the labor market and the social stuctures of family life) sh0uld come to greater commitment and investment in community life (good luck with that).

Lees deze post verder op Global Sociology

Reacties (5)

#1 tienwijzen

In de goede oude tijd was er personeel, en dominees en pastoors.
Is er nu echt veel veranderd ?

  • Volgende discussie
#1.1 Karl Kraut - Reactie op #1

En schoenmakers, kappers, kleermakers, glazenwassers, frietbakkers, schoorsteenvegers, behangers, verhuizers, wasserettebazen, restaurateurs, sportinrichtingen, timmerlui, bordeelhouders etc.; hetgeen niet eens uitsluit dat al deze vermaledijde marktpartijen ook (verre) familie zouden zijn, waarom je misschien korting kan krijgen.
Maar het kan je zelfs duur(der) komen te staan, om alles binnen de familie proberen te houden.

#1.2 Prediker - Reactie op #1.1

Je ziet toch hopelijk wel het verschil tussen een schoorsteenveger en iemand die voor jou het gras komt maaien? Of een kindermeisje en iemand die een kinderpartijtje voor je komt organiseren?

#1.3 tienwijzen - Reactie op #1.2

Veel kinderen van rijke ouders werden door kindermeisjes etc. opgevoed.

#2 Snaporaz

Locations = page numbers?

  • Volgende discussie
  • Vorige discussie